The fabless-foundry model will survive (at least through 14-nm)
Handel Jones, International Business Strategies Inc.,
EETimes (6/15/2012 6:59 PM EDT)
Editor's note: This article was rewritten in rebutal to comments made in April by Mark Bohr, an Intel Senior Fellow. As reported by EE Times, Bohr said the fabless-foundry model is"collapsing."
What are the problems?
1. Parametric yields at 28 nm are not at expected levels. Process variables such as random dopant fluctuations, line width and line gap variations, and via resistance, which affect RC-related timing issues, result in both unpredictable and low parametric yields for the targeted specifications. The process variables have increasing impact on leakage, power consumption and yields.
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- 1.6T Ultra Ethernet Controller
- Chiplet Die-to-Die Interconnect IP Solution
- High speed MACsec Engine 100G/200G/400G/800G/1.6T
- Temperature/Voltage sensors
- AMBA Bus Host to eSPI Controller/Target
Related News
- TSMC Selects Legend's Model Diagnoser for Standard Cell Library Quality Assurance
- HDL Design House announces AT25DF161 VITAL behavioral model
- Carbon Design Systems Adds Co-Simulation Model Library to Expanding System-Level Validation Tool Suite
- Carbon Automates AXI Interconnect Model Creation
Latest News
- Imec unlocks fourfold UWB range extension using world-first narrowband receiver chip compliant with IEEE 802.15.4ab standard
- Alliance for Open Media Releases AV2 Codec, Advancing Next-Generation Open Video Coding
- VeriSilicon Drives Commercial Adoption of AV2 Across Next-Generation Video and Streaming Applications
- Cadence Announces Collaboration with Intel Foundry to Accelerate Intel 14A Process Optimization for HPC and Mobile Designs
- Menta and Presto Engineering Announce Strategic Collaboration to Accelerate Adaptive ASIC Architectures with Embedded FPGA Technology