The problem with the definition of ESL
How long have we heard the promises associated with a move to the Electronic System Level (ESL)? For the longest time it seemed as if all of the predictions about its growth kept moving out another year - every year. It always appeared to be just on the cusp of exploding, but never quite happened. And then all of a sudden, without any kind of fanfare it was here. People are talking about how they use it, their successes, they are complaining about aspects of it as if this was technology they had been using for years. They have wish lists, and openly talk about the limitations. Perhaps the most interesting part is that many of them don’t even call it ESL - It is just getting the job done. How can this be?
To read the full article, click here
Related Semiconductor IP
- nQrux® Root of Trust IP
- AXI to UCIe Bridge IP
- UCIe 2.x Controller IP
- SWI3S (SoundWire I3S Interface) Peripheral Controller Core IP
- OpenTitan-based RISC-V Secure Element
Related Blogs
- 8K Ultra HD: A Giant Leap for High Definition Televisions
- Embarrassingly Parallel Problems: Definitions, Challenges and Solutions
- Critical Safety Overview and Definitions
Latest Blogs
- From Bug Hunting to Engineering Methodology: Lessons from AI-Driven Development
- Manufacturing Intelligence: Turning EDA Data into Trusted Action
- Execute-in-Place: Getting More from Embedded NVM
- Rethinking RTL flows with AI-driven hybrid formal verification
- Arm and NVIDIA: Building the trusted compute foundation for the agentic AI era